6 NC GOP Representatives support the firing of unwed mothers

Welcome back to the 19th Century:

H.R. 2802 This Act may be cited as the “First Amendment Defense Act”.

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Federal Government shall not take any discriminatory action against a person, wholly or partially on the basis that such person believes or acts in accordance with a religious belief or moral conviction that marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman, or that sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.

Bolding mine. This is not a hypothetical. There are several civil cases of "wrongful termination" pending right now filed by women who were fired for getting pregnant out of wedlock. While most of these women were employed by religious institutions, their previous employers were already allowed some protections in making personnel decisions based on religious grounds. But this bill would broadly expand the exemptions to include contractors, sub-contractors, grant recipients, pretty much any corporation that does business with the Federal government. And Holding, Walker, Hudson, Rouzer, Pittenger, and Meadows all think this is a good idea. In any sane world, they would have their chairs pulled out from under them in the next election because of this. But the Magic 8-Ball sez, "Yeah, and I'd like for you to stop shaking me, but that's not going to happen."

Tags: 

Comments

Wouldn't this ...

... simply encourage abortion?

That crossed my mind.

If being fired from your job was a possible consequence of carrying to term, a lot of those single pregnant women who were sitting on the fence would probably hop off.