Debate update

Seven weeks ago I imagined that North Carolina and BlueNC would have broken exciting new ground by now. We were going to transform public engagement in statewide campaigns so that any citizen in North Carolina could ask any candidate the questions that matter most.
As some of you will remember, I invited both Richard Moore and Beverly Perdue to join us for the first-ever virtual gubernatorial debate, and both candidates enthusiastically agreed. All we needed to do was find an hour over the course of two months where they would both be available at the same time. I regret to report that no such hour has been found.
I've gone back and forth between the campaigns four or five times, asking for dates and options. The process has been orderly but slow, reflecting the reality of all of our busy schedules. One candidate could be here by 7 o'clock, but the other couldn't come until 7:45. One could do Sunday night, the other could only do Saturday morning. You get the picture. These folks are tightly booked in a race to lead one of the fastest-growing states in the country. And finding time for an audience with a few thousand bloggers and lurkers isn't at the top of anyone's list.
Which brings me to Plan B.
In honor of Sunshine Week and in the spirit of transparency, I'm moving the entire scheduling and logistics discussion out into the public view. If it ends up just being me talking to myself, so be it. Without further delay, here's the plan.
I invite the Moore and Perdue campaigns to talk directly with one another to find a time and a date where they can both participate. What we need is one hour. On the BlueNC end, we'll find a way to make it work no matter when they can meet. We have a handful of front-pagers, so even if one of us is out of town, others can fill the host/moderation duties.
If the campaigns can't find that hour, I invite each to let me know if and when they would like to have their own individual live-blogging session. Bev Perdue visited with us awhile ago, and we welcome her return. We haven't had Richard Moore here yet, and I'm eager to get him involved in the online world.
If the campaigns can't find a date before April 17th, we will host the virtual debate as a three-day event during the weekend of April 18 - 20, with or without them. We'll publicize the debate statewide and invite citizens to post questions online at their leisure. Betsy and I will make sure things are kept clean and respectful. Candidates and/or their campaign staffers will be free to respond to citizen question ... or not.
We know both campaigns keep an eye on BlueNC from time to time. We also know both are steadily improving their online strategies. This is good. But the next step of moving toward transparent interaction can be a frightening one. Especially when there's no high-profile moderator to weed out the toughest questions.
While it would be neat to bring innovation to electoral politics in North Carolina, the real motivation behind this is engagement. I talk to people all over the state who are eager to participate and to have their voices heard - but there's no easy way for that to happen. We know big corporations get heard. We know special interests get heard. We know big donors get heard. And it's about time the rest of us have a seat at the table.
Please join me in supporting both campaigns as they consider whether to join the discussion and the debate. Use your comments below to encourage them to post their own thoughts and ideas right here in the public view.
An old friend of mine once told me he only knew how to play poker one way: with all his cards face-up on the table. That goes for me, too.

- James Protzman's blog
- Login or register to post comments








I also think they don't need to worry about what time of day
they choose since our traffic will spike for the debate. We usually encourage candidates to do live-blogs in the evening to take advantage of naturally higher traffic volumes.
We will make it work. Trust me.
Robin Hayes lied. Nobody died, but thousands of folks lost their jobs.
Also, I think with this format
we need to know the questions in advance. If it's going to be a true debate the campaigns should be able to respond to each other and since it's a blog they should respond to our community members. Maybe we need to limit the main questions and have those posted in advance. Then the campaigns and community get a chance to respond to their prepared answers. Good, bad ?
Robin Hayes lied. Nobody died, but thousands of folks lost their jobs.
...and another thing
time limits.....We could have 4-5 main questions. The campaigns can post their responses and then there are 8-12 minutes for community/campaign questions and answers about their responses. Once that time limit is reached we simultaneously post the next question.
Robin Hayes lied. Nobody died, but thousands of folks lost their jobs.
I have to agree, Betsy.
The questions need to be posted in advance due to time constraints of a Live Blog as well. That way they can have an idea of what they will need to be considering so their answers to each others questions will be more well thought out and more quickly posted.
North Carolina. Turning the South Blue!
How many do you think we should post?
At first I thought 6, but I'm not so sure. I'm thinking we should probably post 4 or 5.
Robin Hayes lied. Nobody died, but thousands of folks lost their jobs.
4 or 5 sounds good to me
as long as they aren't softball questions. I hate it when candidates are given passes by the media.
No matter that patriotism is too often the refuge of scoundrels. Dissent, rebellion, and all-around hell-raising remain the true duty of patriots.
Progressive Discussions
I'm thinking 4 might be the optimum number
but you might get away with 5, depending on the time limit per question and answer.
Likely 4 would be the safe bet and they could really load up on those.
North Carolina. Turning the South Blue!
I think they need to be prepared.
I hope that both campaigns realize that talking points which don't answer the question will be.... politely responded to with a request for clarification.
One of the pitfalls of childhood is that one doesn't have to understand something to feel it. - Carlos Ruiz Zafon
We may have a date!
Currently zeroing in on March 31. Stay tuned!
April Fool's Day
I have been holding off on deciding who to vote for, so this will be it for me. Whichever candidate connects with me on the issues, I'm making up my mind.
One of the pitfalls of childhood is that one doesn't have to understand something to feel it. - Carlos Ruiz Zafon
March 31 is available :D
Robin Hayes lied. Nobody died, but thousands of folks lost their jobs.
There is one person I'm voting against.
Jay Reiff.
One of the pitfalls of childhood is that one doesn't have to understand something to feel it. - Carlos Ruiz Zafon