Apologies

Friends.

My brush with John Hood of the John Locke Foundation has proven instructive. I looked at my comments through his eyes and didn't like what I saw. I'm turning into an angry jerk.

So for that I apologize -- to him and you all. I promise to do better, though I reserve the right to rant at any time for no reason.

Feel free to call me on it. I'm trainable.

Anglico

First Amendment Symposium

UNC's First Amendment Law Review (FALR) is having a symposium this month focused on religion in schools, and I thought it sounded like the kind of thing readers of this blog might be interested in. Michael Newdow (the recent Supreme Court "under God" plaintiff) will be there, as will experts in constitutional law. There will be discussion about intelligent design, too.

A friend on FALR sent me some information that I've attached to this post. You can register here. It may scare you off, but I plan to be there.

How did NC vote for cutting funding to Disabled Children?

I guess it was the fatigue over the Alito nomination and the SOTU. That is the only reason that I can come up with that the Progressive Blogosphere did not fight the Budget Reconciliation package that passed the House yesterday by a vote of 216-214. This is the bill the Republicans have Bushspeaked into the Deficit Reduction Bill or some such nonsense. What will it really do?

Student Loans - Student loans will take a $12.7 Billion dollar hit. The effect will be to make it harder to get a student loan and will make the interest higher for those who already have pile of students loans - thanks for the help GWB. Gee, do you think his base, that is millionaires, have many outstanding student loans? On Air America, Al Franken has stated his theory that this program is designed to force more lower-income students to chose the military as a way to pay for college. That would be evil, so yes, I believe that is the purpose of this cut.

Wingers and Wackos

Targator's excellent diary on new research about how human brains process political dissonance is worth more discussion. The main thesis is this:

Essentially, it appears as if partisans twirl the cognitive kaleidoscope until they get the conclusions they want, and then they get massively reinforced for it, with the elimination of negative emotional states and activation of positive ones. The result is that partisan beliefs are calcified, and the person can learn very little from new data.

As I noted when the diary was first posted, I fully admit that I can barely stand to listen to wingers talk. I've given that matter some serious thought and arrived at my own 'partisan' explanation:

Simple Question

From WRAL:

Political Parties Divided On Gas Price Solution

POSTED: 5:15 pm EST February 1, 2006

RALEIGH, N.C. -- Is the real problem a few pennies extra at the gas pump or a record $36 billion in profits made by a petroleum giant?

I did not even have to read the rest of the article.

Pages

Subscribe to Front page feed