Facts on HR 4156
Fact Sheet on H.R. 4156, Orderly and Responsible Iraq Redeployment Appropriations Act
As The War Continues in its Fifth Year, Congress Has a Critical Choice:
- Endorse the President’s 10-Year War With No End in Sight, or
- Hold the President Accountable, Requiring Redeployment of Our Troops to Start within 30 Days of Enactment with a Goal for Completion in One Year
Congress Won’t Provide A Blank Check; Instead Is Holding the President Accountable
Today, the House has a critical choice to make:
- Members of Congress will have to decide if they want to endorse the President’s 10-year war in Iraq with no end in sight or finally hold the President accountable, requiring redeployment of our troops to start within 30 days of enactment with a goal for completion in one year.
- Congressional Republicans, who have been supporting the President’s 10-year war, must decide: to continue to run out the clock on the President’s term in order to make this failed policy somebody else’s responsibility or to stand with the American people and vote for a New Direction in Iraq.
President Bush’s failed Iraq policies offer only a 10-year war with no end in sight:
- The Iraq war has already been going on for more than four and a half years.
- The Iraq war is already longer than U.S. participation in World War II, World War I, the Korean War, or the Civil War.
- After more than four and a half years, the price we have paid is high – with more than 3,850 U.S. troops killed and more than 28,000 U.S. troops wounded.
- President Bush’s FY 2008 request would bring the total cost of the Iraq war so far to more than $600 billion – which is greater than the total costs of the lengthy Vietnam war and the Korean war (in inflation-adjusted dollars).
- The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that, under the President’s policies, the costs of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan could total $2.4 trillion through the next decade.
- The war increasingly strains our military – now creating the worst crisis in U.S. troop readiness and our ability to respond to new threats since Vietnam.
This Bill Requires Redeployment of Our Troops Within 30 Days, With A Goal for Completion of Deployment by December 15, 2008
The bill provides that it is the sense of the Congress that:
- The war in Iraq should end as safely and quickly as possible and our troops should be brought home.
- The performance of U.S. military personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan should be commended, their courage and sacrifice have been exceptional, and when they come home, their service should be recognized appropriately.
- The primary purpose of funds made available by this Act should be to transition the mission of the U.S. Armed Forces in Iraq and undertake their redeployment, and not to extend or prolong the war.
This bill supports our troops, while requiring the President to change course in Iraq, with a timetable for redeployment:
- This bill changes the direction of President Bush’s failed Iraqi policy: requiring the President to redeploy our troops, while providing our troops in harm’s way with the resources they need.
- President Bush has asked Congress for an additional nearly $200 billion for Iraq. The House will instead vote on a $50 billion package – funding for the next four months, tied to conditions.
- The bill provides $50 billion to meet the immediate needs of our troops, but defers consideration of the remainder of the President’s nearly $200 billion request.
The bill requires the redeployment of our troops to begin within 30 days of enactment, with a goal of completion of December 15, 2008:
- Within 30 days after enactment of this Act, the President shall commence an immediate and orderly redeployment of U.S. forces from Iraq.
- The Secretary of Defense, by February 1, 2008 and every 90 days thereafter, must report to Congress on the current plan for and the status of the redeployment of U.S. forces out of Iraq and the transition to a limited presence. He must also describe efforts to limit any destabilizing consequences of such reduction and transition, including a description of efforts to work with the United Nations and countries in the region toward that objective.
The Bill Also Places Several Other Conditions on the Short-Term Funding Provided
Most importantly, the bill imposes a timeline for the redeployment of U.S. troops, with a goal of the completion of the redeployment by December 15, 2008. However, in addition, the bill imposes several other conditions on the Administration in order to receive the funding, as outlined below.
The bill requires a transition in the mission of U.S. forces in Iraq from primarily combat to the following limited purposes:
- Protecting U.S. diplomatic facilities, U.S. Armed Forces, and American citizens
- Engaging in targeted counterterrorism operations against al-Qaeda, al-Qaeda affiliated groups, and other terrorist organizations in Iraq
- Providing limited support to Iraqi security forces
The bill prohibits deployment of U.S. troops to Iraq who are not fully trained and fully equipped:
- Requires that troops be “fully mission capable” before being deployed to Iraq
- Allows the President to waive this requirement if he certified in writing that the waiver is required for reasons of national security
The bill ensures no torture:
- Includes an extension to all U.S. government agencies and personnel of the current prohibitions in the Army Field Manual against torture.
The Measure Has the Support of American People
This measure represents the views of the American people, who are demanding a new direction in Iraq:
- In the CNN-Opinion Research poll released on November 8, 68 percent of Americans stated that they opposed the war in Iraq – the highest percentage since the war began.
- In a recent ABC News/Washington Post poll, 60 percent of Americans support redeploying our troops out of Iraq.
- Jerimee's blog
- Login or register to post comments








Front paged
Great information - and great graphic Jerimee.
Folks - read this post and keep it in mind as you hear the spin about this bill.
Be the change you wish to see in the world. --Gandhi
Lynn Woolsey
sent supporters an e-mail explaining her vote. I'm just glad that they are doing something! I was really hoping in July that we might be about to end it...
3 more US troops died there today...
Hi Jerimee. The goal of the Bill is noble and just, but
the recent prior actions of this Democratic Majority gives me pause as to whether or not they have the capacity to stand their ground, politically and morally.
The Blue Dogs are firmly on the side of the President. Irregardless of their public rethoric, privately, and I get this from an informed source, the Blue Dogs and others are reassuring the Republicans that they will back the President on issues related to Iraq.
Nancy Polisi's initial failure to strongly lead the Democrats, from the advent of a Democratic Majority in Congress, set the pace for the divisions we now see within our own party in Washington. No, she is not fully responsible, but an inability, of the other Democratic members, to see firm leadership, distinct vision and a "plan" resulted in the natural cosequence of individual survival. Reed and Polisi seem to be a party of two from my view. I sincerely hope I am totally wrong. I would that the Bill should Pass and, after being Veto'd, that the House send it right back to the President over and over again. We have compromised all that can be compromised.
There are bright places, however, in Washington. Reps Miller and Price seem to be the ones trying to point the way out of the forest, buit few are listening. When elected, I will add to their numbers.
Hope is ever present however and I believe that there is a bright light at the end of the tunnel for America. We (Democrats and Republicans who respect Rule of Law) will lead a way to the place where the wrongs of the past 7 years will be righted.(or should I say "lefted". Is that even a word??)
Hope springs eternal and the Hope of the Nation is in the Democratic Party. Lets not fail those almost three-hundred-Million who are counting on us.
Nancy Pelosi's strength
Or lack there of, is in these numbers:
Senate:
DEM 49
IND 2
GOP 49
House:
DEM 233
GOP 202
here's a wiki article: 110th United States Congress
- - - - -
Thomas Jefferson said you always get the rulers you deserve.
One thing I've seen that does give me hope
is what Reid is doing by not recessing the Senate so Bush can't make any recess appointments.
I totally agree that the Dems have got to push the debate on the war. They were elected, yes -- even you, Mr. and Mrs. Blue Dog, to end this stinking, festering, people-stealing, treasury bleeding, godforesaken war. It's way past time the Blue Dogs backed up their campaign rhetoric. They promised to hold this Administration accountable. I'd like to know when the heck they plan on starting to fulfill that promise, please.
However, even a Blue Dog knows -- this Bush is a rogue president. His vice-president is the anti-progress, pro-greed personification of all that is wrong with modern conservatism as a philosophy. They have to be stopped from doing any more damage to our nation until we can kick their sorry behinds back from whence they came January 20, 2009. I'm glad there will be a Senator or two on the floor over the holidays.
I totally agree
I was thrilled that Reid has finally shown his strength. I was also was pleased to see this:
Be the change you wish to see in the world. --Gandhi