NC General Assembly votes to give money to big corporations, takes it from taxpayers

Cross-posted at the Brock Log.

HB 1761, Job Maintenance and Capital Development Fund was originally only supposed to give $40 million to Goodyear Tire and Rubber in an effort to keep them in their Fayetteville, NC home. In that form, it passed the NC House and Senate (Onslow Reps Cleveland*, Grady, and Tucker and Onslow Senator Brown all voted for the bill), but was felled by the Governor's veto stamp.

An extra session was convened yesterday and today to reconsider the bill. During the sessions, a new and improved version was drafted. This new bill takes an investment of $200 million and gives grants to Goodyear ($24.5 million), Bridgestone Firestone ($22.5 million), and allows for up to $60 million to be given to 5 companies over 10 years. These companies would also be able to lay-off up to 20% of their workforce and still be eligible for the grants.

The House approved that new and improved measure 61-44 (Onslow Reps Cleveland* and Grady voted No, Tucker was excused) today.

*Via email today, Representative Cleveland told me that he did not support either measure.

I do not support either bill at this point.

Why then did he vote to pass the original measure? Is it because it wasn't a big deal at the time and no one thought the Governor would follow through with a veto? Did he think that this episode of taking from the citizens of Onslow County would go unnoticed?

Also today, the so-called compromise bill passed the Senate 25-16. Onslow's Harry Brown also changed his vote to "No" after supporting the previous bill.

In an email, Brown said this:

A compromise bill passed the legislature this afternoon which was essentially the same bill the Governor vetoed. I voted against the bill.

This compromise bill is larger and more expensive than the original, spreads the money around to 5 companies, and gives those companies license to fire one-fifth of their workforce. It's not the same, it's not close to the same as HB 1761. But, even if it were "essentially the same bill", why did Brown switch sides?

Governor Easley, please veto this bill. It's bad legislation. It sets a bad precedent and it's bad for North Carolina. Please. Veto. This. Bill.

Update: I guess it's official: Governor Easley doesn't read this blog. He signed the bill into law just more than an hour after receiving it from the General Assembly. WUNC's Laura Leslie has the statement.

0

where's the outcry "welfare welfare!!!" ???

those darn lazy corporations!

Indeed...

Like others here, I believe that there are better ways to spend the money to help keep manufacturers here...Better rail transportation, upgrades to port facilities, etc. Creating more "brick and morter" reasons that we could keep and reuse (should the corporations leave) is better than just handing over tons-o-cash to the corporate big-wigs and hoping they do the "right things" for North Carolina...

Thomas S. Brock
www.brocknet.net
http://blogs.brocknet.net/brocklog/

What have YOU done today to elect a Democrat?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

And Helms begat Reagan...


Arguably, Ronald Reagan's Helms enabled win in the 1976 NC primary was all the encouragement he needed to try again in 1980, setting the stage for the Reagan Revolution and synergistic escapades like this one...

TrueMeckDem on Myers Park Pat

"My opinion of Pat has changed over the years. I used to think he was truly a man of the people but the longer he has been mayor, the less I think of him.

As with most cities, Charlotte has three political parties: Dem, Rep, and Chamber of Commerce. Pat is definitely the puppet of the COC here. What is good for business is good for Charlotte and Pat ... very personable guy, he has gotten a bunch of Dems in these parts to vote for him but I don't trust him."

Join the discussion here.