Edwards Supports Net Neutrality

While I work to fight HB1587 in the NC house I was wondering where our Presidential candidates might stand on this bill. HB1587 is ANTI-Net Neutrality on a very local level. Federal anti-net neutrality legislation isn't going fast enough for the telcos so they went to the state legislature. So today I found a letter John Edwards wrote to the FCC. (Hat tip to Micah Sifry on Tech Pres)

Via Electronic Comment Filing System

Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20554

Re: Docket 07-52, In the Matter of Broadband Industry Practices

Dear Commissioners:

I understand today is the last day that you take public comments before starting to decide whether the Internet is going to remain free and open, or whether a few big telecommunications and media companies will be able to decide what content we get to read, listen and watch first.

This question goes to the heart and soul of democracy. For democracy to work in this country, people need to be well informed and we need to hear a wide variety of diverse voices.

Equal access to the Internet is also important for growing our economy. Small businesses and entrepreneurs cannot hope to outbid big companies for preferred status on the Web. It is worth asking whether new businesses like Amazon and eBay could have emerged into fast-growing powerhouses if they had been shunted to the slow lane of the information superhighway.

If you do not guarantee net neutrality, the Internet could go the way of network television and commercial radio - with just a few loud voices and no room for the grassroots and small entrepreneurs. Our country is already divided enough between the haves and have-nots. Where we go to school, where (and if) we get health care, whether we can retire with dignity - we have big divides in all of these areas in this country. While we work to create one America, we should not allow the Internet to be divided so that some web sites work faster based on who can pay the highest access fees. That would make the other important work we have to do that much harder.

I urge the FCC to continue to preserve free expression and commerce on the Internet by continuing to enforce net neutrality.

Sincerely,

John Edwards

THANK YOU John Edwards! Ever since you've sat and listened to podcasters and bloggers I've felt we had hope you would support Net Neutrality. Sometimes I wonder if I support Edwards cause he's a local boy. But now I know there is another plank in his platform that REALLY matters to me.

In the 21st century the power required to bring about equality will come from the Internet. The amount of power obtained will be determined by how much information you can create and have access too. Net Neutrality is vital to a future of equality. A modern populist is a techno-populist who supports Net Neutrality.

I hope President Edwards will be a techno-populist. How will JRE bridge the digital divide if he becomes president?

(Cross posted from yesh.com)

Trackback URL for this post:

http://bluenc.com/trackback/6782
0
Jerimee's picture

HB1587

Thanks Brian for following this. I assume HB 1587 is still alive, and poses a plausible chance of being passed?

- - - - -
Where Liddy At?
Where is Liddy?
Anyone seen Liddy?

Robert P.'s picture

Edwards has always been ahead of the game....

i think due to the OTHER Edwards. A true blogger like Elizabeth would understand the importance of internet privacy, anti-spyware acts, and net neutrality. Hence, the reason (I assume) that John has always been ahead of the pack on these issues.

One man with courage makes a majority.
- Andrew Jackson

BrianR's picture

Elizabeth Understands Tech

You are quite right RobertP - Elizabeth Edwards gets it. She really impressed Ruby and I at the Podcasters dinner. Serious props are due to her. I hope to hear more from both of the Edwards about bridging the digital divide.

Jerimee - Sadly HB1587 is still alive. I responded in detail here
http://bluenc.com/stop-nc-hr-1587%3A-prevent-big-telecom-from-killing-mu...

BrianR's picture

Edwards at Google

Watch this video from May where Edwards elaborates on his stance on Net Neutrality and other things.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rG-_VHAITtI

Unique's picture

One Stop - Easy to Use - Easy to Share

Save The Internet

Who wants to get rid of Net Neutrality?

The nation's largest telephone and cable companies — including AT&T, Verizon, Comcast and Time Warner — want to be Internet gatekeepers, deciding which Web sites go fast or slow and which won't load at all.

They want to tax content providers to guarantee speedy delivery of their data. They want to discriminate in favor of their own search engines, Internet phone services, and streaming video — while slowing down or blocking their competitors.

These companies have a new vision for the Internet. Instead of an even playing field, they want to reserve express lanes for their own content and services — or those from big corporations that can afford the steep tolls — and leave the rest of us on a winding dirt road.

The big phone and cable companies are spending hundreds of millions of dollars lobbying Congress and the Federal Communications Commission to gut Net Neutrality, putting the future of the Internet at risk.

Isn't the threat to Net Neutrality just hypothetical?

No. By far the most significant evidence regarding the network owners' plans to discriminate is their stated intent to do so.

The CEOs of all the largest telecom companies have made clear their intent to build a tiered Internet with faster service for the select few companies willing or able to pay the exorbitant tolls. Network Neutrality advocates are not imagining a doomsday scenario. We are taking the telecom execs at their word.

My letters went out today. Did yours?

Colin Powell Weeps at Obama Victory

"Look what we did. Look what we did."

Calendar

«  
  »
S M T W T F S
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
Add to calendar