Not a year for increased state and local tax?
Some people say that, with the current economic problems, this year is not one to raise taxes.
Yes, many people’s finances are tight at this time. Families are having to tighten their belts and do without many things they would like to have. Vacation travel, meals in restaurants, and many other things are being cut back. Many families will have to make the decision every time they spend money: must we have this expense?
However, the needs of municipalities, counties, and states continue. School districts have to buy more land and build more schools to handle the increased school population. The construction and land acquisition costs are far higher than they were for existing schools. Streets have to be improved to handle the increased traffic. A larger population will require more services.
A family may be able to do without many things, but we cannot ask them to do without classrooms for their children or roads to drive on. These things must be paid for, and they are paid for with our tax money.
I realize that times are tough for many people. Many people cannot pay higher property tax or higher sales tax on their necessities. However, beer and cigarettes are not necessities. Those who cannot afford or do not want to pay a higher tax can do without them. The legislature should consider these tax increases before they cut needed services.
Transfer taxes affect only those people who have just sold a home or other property, and at the time that they are receiving income from the sale of property. They have been rejected by voters who were led to believe that enactment of the transfer tax would result in a tax increase for everyone. Perhaps they will reconsider when they find out that defeat of a transfer tax will only mean a higher property tax – the real home tax – for everyone.
There are many who, in spite of the current economy, can pay more to provide the schools and services that we need. Shouldn’t we consider an increase of tax for the highest earning taxpayers? Perhaps an additional tax on luxury cars or on heavy gas guzzling cars could be used.
No one wants to pay higher taxes. But the schools, roads, and other services that we depend on must be paid for.
- itismyopinion's blog
- Login or register to post comments








Breaking point
The N&O's lead editorial today addresses this issue with a plea to governments to temper their likely increases in property taxes because so many people are struggling. Referring to projects for which cities are seeking funding in Raleigh, Durham and Chapel Hill, they write:
Until the overall economic news is better for everyone?
I don't see that happening anytime in the next 30 years. With our state and our nation so critically dependent on oil, we have moved into a new era where costs of operating our governments and our households have been fundamentally realigned. There will not likely be "better economic news" in the foreseeable future. Instead, we will slowly come to grips with the reality of a generation of pure insanity on the energy front, insanity which has cost us dearly in terms of environmental concerns, and which will soon cost us dearly in terms of living standards, global competitiveness and the expectations of future generations.
In my darker moments, I see The Road ahead of us, and it is not a pretty sight.
More on money
Bad money.
GREAT book, James.
Highly recommended.
Does a great job highlighting the declining quality of government economic statistics -- makes you feel like you're in the Politburo, hearing about fantastic grain harvests and happy peasants in the hinterlands...
William (B.J.) Lawson
Congressional Candidate, North Carolina's 4th District
About the only option we have
... is to expect accountability from our elected representatives. This seems like a great opportunity, if exhaustion hasn't set in. Of course, we'll all be spending more time at home, I predict....