On John Cornyn, Or, Let's Play "20 Questions"

I am again today playing the part of the player at the piano bar. Today’s request is from sarantx, over at the John Edwards site, who wonders how we might resolve her (and by extension, Texas’) John Cornyn problem.

For those not aware, Cornyn is the former Texas Attorney General who filled in the last few weeks of Phil Graham’s term following his own election in 2002, and before his inauguration in 2003. He is serving his first term, and is up for re-election in this cycle.

This is one of the more difficult diaries I have written in a while, mainly due to the strange nature of Texas politics.

It is difficult to describe exactly how weird Texas is in this way, and should you require a refresher course, I would direct you to the works of Molly Ivins, who was able to sustain a long and distinguished career thanks to the bizarre antics of the Texas Lege, and the unusual behavior of the Texas voter.

It is also fair to point out that in many states the political spectrum rums from blue to red. In Texas it’s more like blue to red to more red to super duper red.

Suffice it to say that you can travel very far off the beaten track and still win elections in Texas.

There are demographic issues that also impact the Texas vote, and for that background I would refer you to one of our earlier discussions, “On Unexpected Opportunities, Or, Wanna Win Texas?” to see the numbers.

Perhaps a quick recap? OK. Basically, Texas women are less likely to vote than almost any others in the US, and in fact 6.7 million are not voting at the present time. (In contrast, the total number of votes cast for the Cornyn and his opponent, Ron Kirk, the former mayor of Dallas, in the 2002 Senate race, was only about 4.5 million.)

Just to reinforce the point-more women in Texas did not vote than the total of all voters in 2002.

This is clearly the first step to defeating Cornyn-get new voters voting.
Especially women.

How can this be done? By reminding women that they are the ones who have to look after their families-and that Republican policy is anything but family-friendly.

But I have another idea as well: the best defense is a good offense.

Hire a camera operator. Have someone follow every public step he makes, and let him write his own anti-Cornyn commercials. Democratic Party, time to step up with some funding, if you haven’t already.

Now that we have him on camera, there should be an effort to ensure that whenever he appears, he is forced to answer-or duck-questions about his views on today’s issues.

When you look at his positions on issues, you find a very “target rich environment” to question.
For example:

--Texas is possibly the most military State of all. Why were you unaware of the Walter Reed problems and issues affecting veterans who can’t get disability ratings before the Democrats raised the issue? Why don’t you care about veterans?

--Why do you support sending troops to war who aren’t properly equipped? Why did Texans have to buy body armor for their family members in Iraq until Democrats raised the issue?

--You voted against working to reduce oil imports in 2005. Saudi Arabia and Iran control major parts of our oil imports. You claim you support Homeland Security. How do those two positions fit together?

--You claim setting a date to leave Iraq is “how to lose”. How can you ever leave if you never set a date to leave? Do you support a “forever” war?

--Why did you vote no to restrict corporations from financing terrorists?

--Your own website lists your positions on “Constitution & the Rule of Law”. There is not a single word on that page about the Patriot Act, or Enron, or the Attorney General. Why?

--Your own website says you do not support “mandating national standards and curricula” for education. The very next sentence says “Local schools need to be held accountable by testing for real results”. How does this make sense?

--Your own website says you created the “Texas Internet Bureau” to arrest those who prey on children over the Internet. Should Mark Foley be arrested and prosecuted for doing the same thing? If not, why?

--Remember Katrina? The levees aren’t fixed, neither are New Orleans’ pumps, and what about redevelopment? FEMA? There’s not a single word about any of this on your website. Why don’t you care about Americans facing another hurricane season?

So there you go, sarantx:

--let’s dog Cornyn with cameras, to let his own words work against him.

--let’s force him to explain in front of those cameras the answers to these questions (and any others we can think up-suggestions below, please...)-or, in the alternative, let’s put images of him ducking the questions on YouTube, and Texas TV news, and the national outlets, as well.

--most important of all, as we have said before, get Texas women voting. Convince them that their families’ quality of education, economic future, and very survival (Iraq today, Iran tomorrow...) is at stake.

This is not an impossible task, but it will require funding, and big-time effort, and a willingness to find non-voters and show them it’s worth the effort to get involved.

Time is also a factor-by spring of ’08 the legwork needs to be well under way. Reach out to women’s groups, churches, and veteran’s groups now. It will be worth the work next November.

--crossposted wherever they'll have me

4

who wants...

...a framed copy of the jesus day proclamation?

i know i do.

This might sound sexist

How can this be done? By reminding women that they are the ones who have to look after their families-and that Republican policy is anything but family-friendly

Maybe it is sexist, but it is true.

it is sexist...

...and, sadly, all too true.

Why yes, it is sexist.

How can this be done? By reminding women that they are the ones who have to look after their families-and that Republican policy is anything but family-friendly

And reminding women that they are the ones who have to look after their families is kind of sexist, too, don't you think?

"Be the change you wish to see in the world." - Gandhi

That was the part that I thought was sexist

and this is the part that I thought was true.

Republican policy is anything but family-friendly



Robin Hayes lied. Nobody died, but thousands of folks lost their jobs.

there is no question this...

...can be viewed as sexist, in the sense that it identifies one gender as different from another.

but consider this: the strategy is suggested because women in texas choose not to vote in higher numbers than almost any other state.
men in texas are far more likely to vote than women. (again, follow the links back to the "unexpected opportunities" diary for a full rundown of the numbers...)

further, primary family care is far more likely to be in the hands of women than men. there are more single moms than dads, for example; and even in two-parent families the burden of childcare often falls on the mom. even a working mom.

finally, i would submit that differentiation by gender for purposes of message identification in a campaign is politics 101.

why?

because, like it or not, men and women see the world in different ways, and tons of data exists to suggest message differentiation between genders works.

so the real question is: is the message appropriate?

does it degrade or demean women?
i don't think this message does.

is it intended to deprive women of rights or opportunities?
no.

does it reinforce a stereotype?
yes.
however, as we discussed above, there is a factual basis for the message-women usually do end up having to be the family nurturer.

lastly-what is the alternative?
political messages that fail to acknowledge gender differences will likely be less effective.

i don't support a "win at any costs" approach, but should we put away the option of speaking to women as women?

I've always resented messages like that.

I'm a woman, and have been a single mom. But then again, I've always voted,and done my best to share responsibilities equally with a child-rearing partner, so perhaps my view on your message is a bit skewed. Additionally, in the work I do, the dads I come into contact with are the ones who are sharing an equal, or even the bulk of the burden of caring for their families, so there again, I have a completely different, and admittedly anecdotal, view of the situation.

To be fair to you, I didn't follow your links, and I'm sure Texas is different than NC. I'm pretty sure Texas is different than most places!

"Be the change you wish to see in the world." - Gandhi

texas women rank...

...43rd in voter registration, and 49th in turnout, suggesting this is a huge unharvested resource for those seeking to win texas elections.

the report from which this data was derived is located here.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Bill Clinton's speech to the DNC


The Dark Side Chronicles


Charlotte Mayor Pat McCrory says he wants to change the culture in Raleigh. I guess that's why he wrote this letter to PAC lobbyists asking for their fundraising help. Change you can believe in? Riiiiiiight. Join the conversation here.