The responsibilities of being a progressive

As the year 2009 draws to a close, and idealism appears to be suffocating under the combined weights of pragmatism and corporate greed, I find myself pondering what might have gone wrong and trying to figure out ways to reverse this sad and alarming situation. This, to me, is the heart and soul of Progressivism. To face an unfortunate (or inconvenient) truth, and try to change it for the better. Join me, and I promise you won't regret it.

First, I want to dispel a myth about Liberals and/or Progressives that has been manufactured by those who lack vision. We have been painted as weak because our collectivist beliefs trend towards allowing government to play a larger role in our lives, and a neat catch-all term of "Paternalism" has been attached, which has the added benefit of making us sound like little children dependent upon Daddy to provide sustenance and direction. Oh, and we're also self-centered, because our desire to help those in need is really just an ego boost. As amusing as these fallacies are to those on the right, they are merely constructs that help them deal with their own shortcomings.

Far from shirking or abdicating responsibility for the well-being of our society, we accept it wholeheartedly. Indeed, we even take up the slack of those who think only of themselves or their tight little group of like-minded narcissistic misanthropes, who could place their empathy in a thimble and still have room to store some other stuff. But I digress. I had intended to keep this missive free of anger and invective, but I also wanted to clear the air, because I'm going to ask you folks to do even more than you have been. Maybe more than you care to, but I'll take that chance.

Responsibility. I'm not merely referring to personal responsibility, wherein you focus upon "doing no harm", or even noblesse oblige, which may or may not have some guilt associations for those who have prospered in this life. No, I'm talking about the responsibility of discovering the truth and acting upon it. This is quite possibly the most challenging form of responsibility, because you just don't have anything to lean on while you're doing it. You must learn, and you must teach, with humility as a constant companion. This is the only road to true progress, and we need as many travelers down this road as we can get.

With such altruism in mind, let's talk some about politics, as distasteful as that subject may be right now. Many reading this have actually campaigned for office, and some of you were victorious, and are maybe even serving yet today. BlueNC has been deeply involved in election politics in the past, and will hopefully continue to be involved in the future. Some of you have sacrificed a great deal personally, in time, money and spirit on the altar of election politics, and you can be proud of that. You can also rest assured that you have made progress. But, like a tug-of-war in the sand, unexpected forces can sometimes reverse that progress, and pull us even closer to where we don't want to go.

And what about the growing ranks of Independents? For sure, a part of that migration away from the main two political parties is due to disenchantment from either specific positions or "business as usual" political backscratching, but I think there's more. I think a growing number of people feel intellectually limited or "deprived", if you will, within the framework of the parties themselves, and they desperately want more.

So what does all that have to do with being a (good) Progressive? If we want to bring about change in policy, then we have to change the way politicians think. Just helping to push them into office is not enough. Just seeking out the rare breed of electable Progressive is not enough. We have to learn, and we have to teach.

If we lived in a vacuum, or were raised in a creche where humanity was the educational focus, I have no doubt that the vast majority of us would be Progressive. But we don't live in a vacuum. We live in a world that is reality deprived. We live in a world shaped by advertisers and corporate propagandists. Truth is more elusive today than it was in the Dark Ages, where plagues were attributed to demons and good fortune was measured by how many spoons full of gruel had a chunk of meat in them.

We have a unique opportunity here, folks. The Age of Reason is not dead, and critical thinking skills have not been lost, they're waiting patiently for you to use them. We can change the way our politicians think, and we can even change the way society as a whole thinks. The intellectually deprived Independents I mentioned above may be the first to listen (or read, whatever). But we must learn, and we must teach. You don't think you're up to it? The hell with that. I'm not up to it, but I'm going to do it anyway. Join me.

Independence

After I threw up my hands in frustration with the Democratic party a couple of years ago, I got connected with some of the folks focused on independent voting. It felt like a siren song, but I've largely kept my distance. I'm a Democrat at heart.

That said, the independent movement has one big allure to me: it's not yet controlled by corporations. That and the fact that the people involved aren't crazy Libertarians.

Over the past decade, it feels like the composition of independents has shifted from right to left. A lot of disaffected progressives are getting activated, so I'm told.

I don't see a workable party coming out of the independent movement any time soon. Not a cohesive one anyway.

If I were going to make a a party, it would be called the Blue Party. It would look a lot like the Democratic party except it would have a bold libertarian streak. The Blue Party would operate outside the influence of corporate money in every way. And it would thrive online.

Thanks for writing this.

_____________________________

The State Bar is not an ordinary plaintiff.

I'm a Democrat

at heart, too, and I honestly believe in many of the core principles the Party stands for. And I didn't come by those beliefs through dogma or conditioning, I arrived at them on my own and realized there was a pretty big group of people who felt the same way.

But there also seems to (sometimes) be a huge gap between the principles and the actions, which tells me we may be spending too much time on form and not enough on substance. Hence, the "learning and teaching" I rambled on about above. If these principles can be reinforced in a thoughtful fashion, they shouldn't be so easily discarded when policy is being set. Or if they are discarded, more people should stand up and say, "Hey!"

I think we need more people who can think for themselves...

and not be categorized into any political segment. Our corrupt politicians love to be able to point at any of their critics and claim that they represent "socialists", "right-wingers" or "liberals", etc. That's the signal to all the dummies from their electorate to block out any thoughts or new ideas being accepted, or even analyzed. Having grown up during the 40s and 50s, I can remember a lot of people with limited education, but they did know who was getting jobs and benefits for them. We have whole loads of people now who get manipulated by the media pushing polls, which in themselves were formulated for confusion, But, nonetheless, are accepted by the populace.

It seems like

every time I get into a conversation with someone (from either party) about politics, the environment, etc., they simply parrot things they heard on Fox, MSNBC, or even (God help us) paid-for commercials, like the ones the fossil fuel industry runs. We do need to be thinkers, not parrots.

What you got against parrrots?

Merry Christmas Eve!

_____________________________

The State Bar is not an ordinary plaintiff.

Ditto, James

Hope you and your family have a great Christmas as well as EVERYONE here on BlueNC.

And, even though I've said it before, THANK YOU, sir, for all you do for us here. It has been a wonderful experience this year.

___________________________________________________
“Discussion is an exchange of knowledge; argument is an exchange of ignorance" __ Robert Quillen

You too, Mr. Trot

It's been fun getting to know you ... I look forward to more in the year ahead.

_____________________________

The State Bar is not an ordinary plaintiff.

Thinking

I empathize with those who can't or don't have the time to think critically. When I was on the Town Council here in Chapel Hill, I remember how much work was required to understand so many of the technical details. And then I remember being frustrated by smart people coming in at the last minute saying "How come they weren't told this or that?" I felt like screaming.

But look who I would have been screaming at. A woman working two jobs and raising three children alone. A family split down the middle by immigration laws. A policeman working the beat with real life and death decisions around every corner.

There are lots of reasons for being thoughtless. Lack of time, lack of skills, lack of interest, lack of access. When I think of all the issues I could and should know more about ... goodness gracious!

Throw Art Pope's millions into that combustible mix of ignorance and you have something akin to napalm. There's aren't that many institutions that matter - a couple of newspapers and radio stations, a few blogs, a House and Senate run by business interests. Easy enough to manipulate with a concentration of resources.

It's called subsidized news and it operates on the principle of agenda setting.

At the core is an amazingly small cabal:

  • A handful of reporters and editors, 15 at most
  • Old guard political operatives from the Helms and Hunt dynasties, a dozen if that
  • A couple of think tanks and issues-oriented non-profits, maybe 20 people altogether
  • Insiders from various UNC boards, major law firms, big companies, 50 or so

That's fewer than 100 people running the show, controlling the flow of information, doing the analysis, setting the agenda.

In this kind of environment, a concentrated focus of ten million dollars from Art Pope can tilt the balance enormously. Especially when you also have him "architecting" the strategy in local elections. He's mastered the science of blur lines between personal, corporate, and non-profit in a way that gets him what he wants more often than not. The Puppetmaster indeed.

Against that backdrop, the only good alternative I can see is to expand the quality and volume of conversations so that more people have a chance to work things through in their own minds. So that more people are aware of an alert for subsidized news. So that more people know more about what's going on. So that the powerful voice of corporate interests is balanced by personal freedom. This is why I blog, and it's time to take things to the next level.

_____________________________

The State Bar is not an ordinary plaintiff.

Too much or not enough

information can lead to the same thing: A lack of understanding.

The "too much" approach is often used intentionally to obfuscate, as evidenced by legal discovery that produces thousands of documents that may include a few dozen that are pertinent, or extremely complex scientific analysis presented to citizens or elected officials who don't have the background to understand or question the findings.

The "not enough" seems self-explanatory, but there is a big difference between people or entities intentionally withholding information, and information that is simply difficult to locate. In this day and age, it's hard to imagine that there could be tons of info not in a digital/online format that can be found by using a clever search term, but we're still choppin' trees down like crazy and filling 4-drawer cabinets with valuable information that only 2 or 3 people might ever read.

On the bright side, at least we won't run out of things to look for. :)

What does the next level entail?

n/t

Bigger, better, broader?

If the only way to combat corporate influence is through alternative media such as this blog, we have to find a way to engage more people in thoughtful conversations and action. In my mind, that means more original content, polling perhaps, and more focused efforts on influencing mainstream media, etc. I'm not entirely sure how to do all that since we're just making it up as we go, so to speak.

It also means tighter collaboration with other organizations. When Art Pope wants to cover a topic, he starts his own sideshow from scratch. We're blessed with plenty of progressive organizations already in place, though they rarely seem able to come together for concerted action. Perhaps BlueNC can be a catalyst or channel or whatever to help make that happen.

_____________________________

The State Bar is not an ordinary plaintiff.

Your right.

Most of the independents I know would consider being called a Republican or a Libertarian a Dirty Word. Many would still consider themselves a Conservative but there is a growing group of Progressives that are equally as frustrated with Party Politics. I keep saying you have to try to inject what you want into the parties whether it is Progressive, Conservatism or Libertarianism. One thing I know to be a fact is that the likely hood of a Independent Party gaining a significant portion of Seats in the Congress or even perhaps winning the White house is very slim. But Independents can win on the Local level if they stand on strong on principles. Whether they be Progressive or Conservative. It can't be down the middle if they plan on winning. People that stand smack dabb in the middle of a Battle Field will get shot down by both sides.

Anthony D. Hall,

Fighting for Truth, Justice, Freedom and the American Way!

http://www.lenoircountydemocraticparty.org
http://www.hallstyle.blogspot.com

A set back ...

The Fayetteville Observer writes of bankruptsy of the owner, Heartland Publications, of six local newspapers in the Cape Fear Region. The resolution is:

"Heartland spokeswoman Rivian Bell said the company's top lender, GE Capital, has agreed to reduce what it is owed to $70million from roughly $111million. In exchange, the financial-services arm of the industrial conglomerate General Electric Co. would get a 90 percent stake in the company." [emphasis mine]

link

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/12/22/962662

Would appreciate someone fixing ...

Very unfortunate

I have read a number of stories about how newspapers, and in some cases magazine publications, are going under. I disagree with one thing that is said in this story you've linked to:

The privately held company is one of at least a dozen newspaper publishers forced into bankruptcy protection by the recession

A very LARGE contributing factor to our paper print industries failing is right here on the good old Internet. A large portion of our populace now gets the vast majority of its information either through the airwaves or on Internet sites rather than newsprint sources.

And, as a side note, this same venue has also been said to have contributed to the problems now being seen in our postal service.

___________________________________________________
“Discussion is an exchange of knowledge; argument is an exchange of ignorance" __ Robert Quillen

Yes,

and those problems have made it even easier for big business to control what is left of the print industry. Our local newspaper bias towards big business was already in play, and ownership by General Electric Capital suggests that learning and teaching, of the sort mentioned above, will be even more difficult. The reason BlueNC, and folks like Steve, are so important!

Folks like you, too, Zate

It's always good to see you here, and it would be even gooder to see you more often. :)


RoopleTheme!