On Saving 319,000 Jobs, Or, Legislation Keeps Teachers Teaching
As I pick up the pace of work again, coming into the midterms, I have to get some stories cleared off the desk in order to make room for some others, and that’s what we’re about today.
We’ll be talking about saving more than 300,000 of this country’s most important jobs, and paying for it in a way that is not only good policy, but is a real problem for Republicans who are yelling “no new taxes!” once again while pretending they care about actually paying for actual spending and actually want to cut actual unemployment.
We have a bit of work to do today, but we want to keep it somewhat short...so let’s get going.
So across my desk have come documents that report how many jobs will be saved by the House coming back into session to vote out H.R. 1586 and send it to the President for his signature.
Long story short, after all the commemorative pens have been distributed about 319,000 more people will be working, including 161,000 more teachers who will be in class this year then there would have been there if it wasn’t for this bill...and as it happens, that many teachers is actually about 25,000 more people than the total number of workers in all of America’s coal mines combined.
It’s going to cost $10 billion for the “save the teacher’s jobs” part of the bill; another $16.1 billion will be paid to states to help them pay for their share of Medicare expenses this fiscal year, that will allow them to avoid laying off the remaining 158,000 workers, many of whom are working for someone like Child Protective Services or are State Troopers or are working for your State’s Department of Corrections...and about 80,000 of those jobs are private sector jobs, as contractors who work for the various states are also kept on the job.
To give you an idea of just how many teachers we’re talking about, Florida will have 9200 more this fall than they would have otherwise, Illinois will have 5700 more, Kentucky, 2200 more, and in California there’ll be about 16,500 more teachers in the classrooms this fall than if this bill wasn’t going to pass.
You can look up how many more teachers your State is estimated to have this fall at a handy page on the House Committee on Education and Labor’s website.
I don’t have a handy chart for the remaining workers, but if those jobs are more or less distributed the same way you could expect California, as an example, to save a total of about 33,000 jobs with just this one bill, and Florida to save about 18,000.
How badly do states need the money?
By an amazing coincidence, as I’m putting this story together I’m watching tonight’s “The Rachel Maddow Show”, and sure as life, she’s working the same story...and she’s reporting that Paul Krugman’s reporting that several states are literally unpaving their roads because they can’t afford to maintain them any more.
So here’s the best part: it’s all paid for by closing a variety of tax loopholes and recovering money that wasn’t being used from other programs, so no new deficit spending or additions to debt are required.
The tax loopholes?
They take aim at the various methods multinational companies are using to shield US income from US tax collectors; these mostly involve getting a Post Office box in the Cayman Islands, or something similar, and more or less claiming all your US business is derived from your new “regional office”, or that you believe you paid all your income taxes on your US income to some other government.
Our Republican friends are going nutty about this, claiming, as John Boehner just did on “Meet The Press”, that: “...they want to raise the taxes on the American people .”
This is particularly tough for Republicans because they’re dying to save The Bush Tax Cuts For The Really, Really Rich, all $800 billion worth of ‘em, without explaining how they would be paid for, all the while complaining about the much, much, lower cost of paying for saving these 300,000 jobs—and, in the very next sentence, saying they hate deficits...and if you check out the transcript from that “Meet the Press” interview, you’ll see that David Gregory asked Boehner about how he planned on paying for the $800 billion in tax cuts he wants, three different times, and he wouldn’t give a straight answer once.
So when people ask you: “What’s Washington doing about jobs?”, you can tell them they’re not only saving about a third of a million of the jobs that fight fires, and put criminals in jail, and teach your kids this fall—and paying for it, to boot—but those smaller classrooms are also making it more likely that your kids will have better jobs when they grow up; all of that without much help from our Republican friends, who’s biggest job right now seems to be figuring out how to borrow another $800 billion from you and China to give away to their wealthiest friends.
Which is its own special kind of job...and I’m pretty sure the word “snow” is somehow involved in the job description.







just for the record...
...this bill means 5700 teachers will not be dumped in nc.
it's also reasonable to expect another 5700 jobs or so will be saved around state government...so maybe some troopers don't get laid off, and forest fires get fought more effectively, and some inmates serve longer terms instead of getting turned out into your communities...and even if you're a conservative thinker, that can't possibly be a bad thing.
"...i feel that if a person can't communicate, the very least he can do is to shut up." --tom lehrer, january 1965
$62K per job??????????????
The math says $10B divided by 161K teacher jobs is $62K per year. Starting teacher pay in NC runs around $28K and average pay is $44K. Where the hell is the money going? The North Carolina figures show an average of $52.3K per job. I don't get it. And oh, by the way, those "unused" food stamp funds that being shifted to fund this will be restored. There are no savings.....
"A point in every direction is the same as no point at all" - Pointless Man
Where does the money go???
Average PAY is significantly lower than average COST PER EMPLOYEE, as anyone who has ever run a business knows.
______________________________________________________________________
Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted. -- sign on Einstein's office wall.
i tell people...
...to expect to pay 150% of salary for the actual cost of a worker--and that's before any special equipment, which is a big item for lots of state workers, as they require vehicles and tools and radios and lots of other things besides.
"...i feel that if a person can't communicate, the very least he can do is to shut up." --tom lehrer, january 1965
as was noted above...
...there are lots of employee costs that aren't salary, including cost of heath care benefits, social security, unemployment, administrative costs, sick leave, and on and on and on...and if you add it all up, 150% of salary is about what an employee costs.
for a teacher making $40,000, 150% of salary is $60,000, and that's actually right in the range that this bill is costing.
"...i feel that if a person can't communicate, the very least he can do is to shut up." --tom lehrer, january 1965
The Bill just passed
Here's the roll call.
I was pleasantly surprised to see Heath Shuler in the AYE column!
______________________________________________________________________
Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted. -- sign on Einstein's office wall.
Shuler and McIntyre = hypocrites
They voted no on the rule to bring up the bill, then voted for the bill (linked in above comment).
No support, money or votes for these 2 DINOs.
At least Kissell got these votes right.
Separately, watch for which news outlets actually report the items that will be restored in NC's budget once Obama signs this weakened emergency funding.
The priority list is clearly spelled out in the state budget adopted a month or so ago. If a news outlet doesn't report it, then they haven't even begun to do their jobs.
Covering their bases
When trying to impress liberals, they can claim they voted for this. When trying to impress conservatives, they can claim they voted against it. I hate two-faced crap like that.
i hate it, too...
..but man oh man, does it ever seem to work like a charm, time after time.
"...i feel that if a person can't communicate, the very least he can do is to shut up." --tom lehrer, january 1965
i gotta ask you this:
if i'm living in nc-11, i'll be looking at a ballot in november and i'll see shuler and i'll see jeff miller, both looking up at me, and i'll need to pick one.
so...am i better off with jeff miller?
that's a frustrating question to have to deal with, and it's a problem democrats have to face in a bunch of places. for example, nebraska's democratic voters will probably have to hold their noses in '12 and vote for ben nelson as a better option than an even worse republican choice.
and that brings us back to nc-11: are those voters better off voting for miller?
"...i feel that if a person can't communicate, the very least he can do is to shut up." --tom lehrer, january 1965
It is better to make an example of them
The truly heinous Shuler and McIntyre should be turned into a warning for future DINOs.
Yes. Vote against them.
The reason you whine about it working like a charm over and over again (upthread) is because some folks won't call these DINOs' bluffs and toss them in the trash bin of politics where they belong.
If you want somebody different in office, then vote like it -- primary or general.
That's the way to get their attention.
so i've been thinking about this one...
...for a few days now, and i have to sat that i find myself really torn.
in nc, you have three ds in congress whom you would presumably vote out (kissell?), and if you do that in, say, ten states, you lose 30 ds, in order to make a point...and if you combine that with an already difficult environment, it begins to look like it would be us voting in speaker boehner, and that's a worse outcome, to me, than eatin' it with some of the ds that are not as enthusiastic about reform as i am.
if we can't get em in the primary, then we gotta think about national implications, and that was what turned the argument for me.
"...i feel that if a person can't communicate, the very least he can do is to shut up." --tom lehrer, january 1965
Ds or Rs make no difference
Don't worry, my friend. Whether they be "D"s or "R"s, I promise they'll still be together at their favorite country club laughing at how they've fooled so many of the Kool-Aid drinkers.
i just don't agree...
...especially on a macro level.
for example:
--how many republicans have been trying to defund our wars?
how many democrats think invading iran is the way to go?
--how many democrats are telling workers that unemployment insurance makes them lazy...despite all evidence to the contrary?
--those republicans who are farthest to the right want a theocracy, because their faith tells them it's the right thing to do.
democrats who are the farthest to the left want single-payer canadian-style health care...because the verifiable reality is that everyone in canada's covered, for two-thirds of the price...and on average, canadians live five years longer than us.
--two words: "terry schiavo!".
four more: "change the 14th amendment!".
what happens if democrats vote for crazy-ass republicans "just to put a scare" in the democratic candidates, and all parties interpret that to mean voters want less intelligence and more crazy-ass republican in their democrats...which forces republicans to get even nuttier, just to keep the difference evident for "low information" voters?
seriously, i get that democrats have, in many cases, failed to "be all they can be"--but you have to realize that "jesus ain't running", which is a funny way of saying you will never get a perfect candidate, or somebody who always does the right thing in office...and if you really can't differentiate between the 109th and the 111th congress...then you're not really thinking as hard as you should be.
"...i feel that if a person can't communicate, the very least he can do is to shut up." --tom lehrer, january 1965
No, SHuler is the better option
It's conservative district. Keeping the seat in the dem column helps keep reps from committee chairmanships and the deprives them of the ability to start investigations that would further strangle the government.
Environmental Defense Fund
Cell phones will be to the 21st century what tobacco was to the 20th.
My only concern...
...is that after this election, Heath switches parties.
______________________________________________________________________
Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted. -- sign on Einstein's office wall.
the last guy who did that...
...(parker griffith) did not fare so well for the effort, and i'm fairly sure a lot of "borderline" ds are fully aware of that outcome.
"...i feel that if a person can't communicate, the very least he can do is to shut up." --tom lehrer, january 1965
Living in fear
It is better to have Democratic politicians living in fear of us, than to have us living in fear of Republican politicians.
I have no interest in protecting those incompetent at governing from investigations by their colleagues in the political world, as both they and their colleagues draw six-figure salaries and lifetime benefits.
I have an interest in sound economic policies, justice, equality, and other issues dear to me.
The federal Democrats have delivered none of that with their historic majorities.
I would argue that the state level Democrats have done a better job of governing than federal Democrats, so the state level folks deserve support.
The feds...not so much.
How about paying attention ...
Here's an article that lists quite a few accomplishments of congress.
Here's a list straight from the source.
I'd be willing to bet that at least a few of the accomplishments mentioned meet your obviously high standards of justice and equality.
Environmental Defense Fund
Cell phones will be to the 21st century what tobacco was to the 20th.
i wouldn't say that at all...
...start with credit card reform, move along to getting much of financial reform passed...and health care, which did not come out the way i wanted, is still going to take a big whack out of future costs.
winding down iraq, is, in fact, an economic decision as well as a military one...and while we all wanted more out of stimulus, we're not losing 700,000 jobs a month.
to say that obama has been intimidated by republicans unnecessarily is a fair criticism, to say he negotiates badly is another, and it's even fair to say that he's missed about a thousand opportunities to "judo" this stuff right back on the rs...but to say he's dome nothing is to forget what is was like when dubya really did spend eight years not only doing nothing, but working hard to make things worse.
"...i feel that if a person can't communicate, the very least he can do is to shut up." --tom lehrer, january 1965
Medicaid state supported (jointly with feds), Medicare not
From above: It’s going to cost $10 billion for the “save the teacher’s jobs” part of the bill; another $16.1 billion will be paid to states to help them pay for their share of Medicare [sic] expenses this fiscal year...
People not in the human services business often confuse the Medicare and Medicaid programs, but they are very, very different programs, and the funding and the populations served are different. Medicare is a true "single-payer program."
Medicaid was passed in the 60s, too, but as a concession to Southern conservative politicians, it was left under the control of the states' legislatures in terms of benefits offered, so benefits and costs vary from one state to another.
The money to be received in NC for Medicaid benefits is crucial to preserving health care for many poor citizens and especially those on SSI with disabilities. The money was called "FMAP" by politicos and the media and amounted to over $300 million for NC in the final bill.
Martha Brock
you're exactly right...
...and i should have caught the error myself.
"...i feel that if a person can't communicate, the very least he can do is to shut up." --tom lehrer, january 1965
The county commissioners in
The county commissioners in my county just transferred money to the education budget to tide them over until this money arrives from Washington. The idea being that if we wait until the money gets here we are already well into the school year, students schedules are disrupted, and the pickings are slim when it comes to finding the most qualified teachers for the jobs. Our county lost about 75 positions and will be getting back 10-15, so it is significant. One thing though, while this is important the funds can only be used for teachers and there have been a great deal of support positions that have been lost over the last couple of years.
I'm a moderate Democrat.
excellent points...
...and i'll add a bit more to your comment.
in order to get the money, there's an additional condition beyond the fact that the money has to be spent on teachers: districts have to maintain the education budget from the previous year, or, in the most hard-hit locations, the level of the 2006 budget.
"...i feel that if a person can't communicate, the very least he can do is to shut up." --tom lehrer, january 1965