Kay Hagan

To quote Senator Kay Hagan from an article on The Advocate's website today:

Amendment One has far-reaching negative consequences for our families, our children and our communities. ...as a proud daughter of North Carolina, I urge all North Carolinians to join me in opposing it.

To quote Clarke Cooper from Equality NC's website discussing Tea Party supported Republican Congresswoman Renee Ellmers' statement on the amendment:

"Representative Renee Ellmers is speaking for many North Carolina Republicans when she says that you don't have to support marriage equality to know this constitutional amendment is wrong."

There are other Republican, Democratic, Green Party, Unaffiliated folks, and Libertarians from NC who I could list with this ever-growing chorus of bipartisan opposition, but I think these examples powerfully demonstrate why this amendment can be defeated.

Waiting on Kay.

Being a pro-business Democrat is a good thing; being a corporate-owned Democrat, less so. Working with leadership to better serve North Carolina is a good thing; responding "how high?" when party bosses and well-paid alums tell you to jump, less so.

Why do Kay Hagan and Mel Watt support legislation that would harm the open internet?

Hat tip to Ed Cone

North Carolina has the second-longest federal judicial emergency in the nation.

And tell her to vote NO on the Protect IP Act. This is legislation written by commercial interests, for commercial interests, pure and simple.

Democratic Vermont Sen. Patrick Leahy is inexplicably leading the charge in the Senate with the Protect IP Act. Republican Texas Rep. Lamar Smith is leading the companion bill in the House with the Stop Online Piracy Act. This bill would've been rushed through with no debate through both chambers had it not been for the singular efforts of Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden, a true hero of grassroots media and the social web.

Details below the fold.

Dear Kay:

So far, the only people I've found who see a shred of wisdom in your "tax holiday" idea are a handful of bought-and-paid-for members of Congress. Maybe you could use this as an opportunity to be a careful, responsive listener?

As several posts have reported recently, Senator Hagan is leading the charge to give corporations a reward for scamming America. Her "repatriation holiday" is a bad idea at every level of analysis except for the corporate balance sheet.

Never let it be said that BlueNC is a blindly partisan operation.

Regarding Kay Hagan's continuing preference for corporations over of people.

I imagine Cisco’s lobbyists have spent considerable time in Ms Hagan’s office over this one.

I love how the proponents of “tax holidays” always leave out why the money is overseas in the first place. They diverted it there to avoid paying US taxes in the first place. Yes, it was by-the-book legal, but it was still a purposeful attempt to avoid paying US taxes, and everyone knows it.

As the tumult over the S&P downgrade of U.S. debt continues, so does the fleecing of America. We are discussing slashing safety net programs that protect average citizens without jobs in this economy. Meanwhile, Washington considers the Freedom to Invest Act of 2011 (H.R.1834), corporate welfare for "super citizen" companies that moved those jobs offshore and hid profits there, too. The bill's sponsor, Rep. Kevin Brady (R-Texas) received moral support last week from NC Democrat Sen. Kay Hagan: