The BlueNC Virtual Gubernatorial Debate

Last Saturday, the idea of an online forum for engaging the Moore and Perdue campaigns was floated here at BlueNC. Both campaigns responded positively, and a ton of good ideas were proposed by readers in comments, as well as by email.
Here is our best current thinking. I want to be clear that neither campaign has accepted this specific proposal yet.
Proposal
A single two-hour evening session on a date to be agreed upon by both campaigns. Ideally it would be 8 - 10 pm or 9 - 11 pm, when our readership is predictably high. We'll need to steer clear of dates for other debates or major sporting events.
Prelude
Three days before the event, we will post two open threads for warm-up comments and questions. The two threads will be side-by-side in two green blocks at the top of the front page. We will ask a neutral reader (Linda Cloud) to flip a virtual coin to see who will be on the right and who will be on the left. Each post will include identical text with a single link to each campaign's website.
Readers, candidates, staff members, media and anyone else will be free to comment or ask questions on the preview threads, though there is no expectation that campaigns will respond or participate. Whatever works for each campaign is totally up to them.
The Big Day
One hour before the event is scheduled to kick off, we will post two new threads at the top of the front page (in the green boxes). Whoever was on the right side of the page for the preview threads will be flipped to the left and vice versa. Again, the text will be identical. I will welcome both candidates, link to their websites again, and also link to the preview threads.
In all likelihood, readers will begin to ask questions right away. If that doesn't happen, I will select a question from one of the preview threads and post the same question for both candidates. That should get the ball rolling. Candidates and their staffers are free to answer all, any, or none of the questions as they see fit. There will undoubtedly be more questions than they have time to deal with, and they will be free to circle back at their leisure to answer whatever questions they desire, or not.
Candidates will be free to engage with each other as well. For example, if Mr. Moore sees something on the Perdue thread that warrants a comment or question, he is more than welcome to post there. And vice versa, of course.
Also, staffers may post and comment too. We had originally thought that we'd get the campaign managers on for separate sessions, and we may still try to do that. But for now, we're planning to let the candidates speak for themselves if at all possible.
When two hours have passed, we'll post a "thank you" comment on both threads. That comment will signify the official end of the virtual debate, but will not close the threads. Readers, candidates, staffers, etc., will be free to keep up the discussion for as long as they want. The two live-session threads will remain featured in the green blocks at the top of the front page for 48 hours after the sessions are officially ended.
We looked at a range of alternative technologies, including web cams, live-chat, etc., and determined that this is not the time to experiment with something we haven't done before. This "side-by-side" event will operate exactly like any of our live-blogging sessions, except that the two sessions will be concurrent.
Today is your last chance to weigh in on this. Tomorrow I will contact each campaign asking them for dates when they have a two-hour block available in the evening to participate with us. Fundraising and campaign events are usually wrapped up by 9, so I'm optimistic that we'll find an opening fairly soon. Once I get their availabilities, I will look for a date that's open on both schedules, let the campaigns know, and then lock it in.
As I said above, neither campaign has seen this proposal yet, and neither has agreed to it. In the spirit of transparency, we're doing this all out in the open. Worst case, we can fall back on separate sessions.
Your thoughts?







I like the idea
despite the fact that concurrent sessions might be difficult to keep up with for readers who have not made a decision yet and would like to follow in real time. Also - this is likely to attract quite a bit of traffic. Have we made sure our servers can handle it?
Be the change you wish to see in the world. --Gandhi
Traffic
We should be good there, but we'll double check with Media Temple to make sure we're as prepared as we can be. Betsy recently instituted some system upgrades that should at least assure us that nothing will be permanently broken.
The neat thing about blogging is that it is really timeless. I find myself going back to live sessions from months ago, and I suspect these threads will have a long and active presence.
From what I've seen on national blogs, and even here, campaigns come with a small army of staffers who can help them sort through the opportunities. That said, I know I'll be switching back and forth between both threads like crazy.
J
I'm thinking that thread moderators (you, me, Betsy?) might want to be on an open phone line the whole time. I can set up a toll-free conference line so we can jump on any problems and resolve them quickly.
Do good. Be nice. Have fun.
Linda...I'll do everything I can to make sure we're good to go
I will disable all video, etc on the front page and other than our ads, will streamline as much as possible. I will also throttle everything that isn't necessary, so as load demands it certain unnecessary features or functions will shut down. We only use a tiny amount of our bandwidth each month, so that shouldn't be an issue. By the end of the year we'll probably need more memory, but for now, we're good to go.
***************************
Vote Democratic, the ass you save may be your own.
Thanks to all
for the great comments and suggestions in the original post last week. We're trying to break new ground here, but we don't want to discover we're treading on quicksand. That's why we've lowered our technology sights and focused only on what we know we can execute.
Do good. Be nice. Have fun.
Time is too late
I think 7pm to 9pm. With a two hour time frame folks who eat dinner toward the beginning can still come in for the second hour and those folks who need to leave around 8 to put kiddies to bed are there for the first hour and then those of us who regularly neglect our families can be here the entire time. I don't take calls after 9pm (would somebody please tell that to all the young men calling my oldest daughter because they don't seem to believe me?!) and I think most folks really do start winding down after that time. Plus...it's candidates for governor....we will probably have unnaturally high participation.
***************************
Vote Democratic, the ass you save may be your own.
Fair enough.
I'm just trying to make sure there are as few possibilities for conflicts as possible. I go to a lot of fundraisers, and 7 pm is prime time.
Plus, our readership is usually higher after 8 or 9, which is why I lean later.
Let's plan to give options to the campaigns for what works best for them.
Do good. Be nice. Have fun.
OK...I know the taking calls part didn't make sense
but I meant it to show when we start winding down... I didn't sleep last night. I'm beat....or maybe that's beet.
***************************
Vote Democratic, the ass you save may be your own.
Beet
Do good. Be nice. Have fun.
That's it!
That's exactly how I feel!
***************************
Vote Democratic, the ass you save may be your own.
I think the operatives should sign in under their....
own user names. I have no problem with Chief of Staff Tony Maroni (Jk) making statements, but I would prefer that he/she was making them in their own name and not under the "Bev Perdue" or "Richard Moore" account.
Now, another thing that might happen is that the candidate and staff sit there finding questions they like, then pulling out their talking points and having their press people write the responses, which are then "entered" by the candidate.
I'm disappointed nobody liked my Kyte.tv debate idea. We could have had a sponsor!!! And, the candidates would be live.
: )
One of the pitfalls of childhood is that one doesn't have to understand something to feel it. - Carlos Ruiz Zafon
Jesus Swept ticked me off. Too short. I loved the characters and then POOF it was over.
-me
I loved the idea
but it would take more time (and have more technology risk) than I can deal with right now. You forget how far you are ahead of 99.9% of the world.
Regarding how the campaigns respond to questions, I think a little of everything will happen, which in my view is very cool. If we get a bunch of canned stuff, we'll know. If we see sock-puppets, we'll know.
Regulars here have gotten very adept at knowing the real thing when we see it. How the campaigns actually manage the process will be interesting all by itself, and worthy of much commentary and critique. From what I can tell, both have raised their online games considerably over the past few months. It's the new frontier!
Do good. Be nice. Have fun.
Yeah....I know the sock puppets
I will be monitoring that sort of thing the few days leading up to the debate and the day/evening of the debate. Also....I know folks don't always use their mulitple accounts as sock puppets. There's a difference between having a public id and a private id when the two never meet and sock puppets who feed off each other.
***************************
Vote Democratic, the ass you save may be your own.
I think it's important to know that it's really the candidates
Since, in many races, it often isn't.
1 Thessalonians 5:21: But examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
I always wanted to be the avenging cowboy hero—that lone voice in the wilderness, fighting corruption and evil wherever I found it, and standing for freedom, truth and justice. - Bill Hicks
Great stuff
I can't wait!
I think it was Hampton Dellinger who said to me that he'd like to do a four-way version of this for the Lt. Gov. race...
Scrutiny Hooligans - http://www.scrutinyhooligans.us
Yup...that came up on the
Yup...that came up on the site...I think it was either FunLuvn1 or hmmmm....gee now can't remember.... but another BlueNC member brought it up and three of the candidates jumped at the chance. It will be a bit more cumbersome with four/three, but we're working on it.
Robin Hayes lied. Nobody died, but thousands of folks lost their jobs.
***************************
Vote Democratic, the ass you save may be your own.
In was funluvin1
and it will be a bit more cumbersome, but it would be awesome.
Be the change you wish to see in the world. --Gandhi
and THEN can we use Robert's idea?
A live chat setup would be infinitely easier, especially if we're going to do a four-way LG discussion.
I like the idea of live chat.
I think we'd have to test it before we went with a live 4 way debate, though. We don't want to look foolish. Jimmy Carter might kick our ass.
Be the change you wish to see in the world. --Gandhi
Let's do it.
Who wants to be in charge?
Do good. Be nice. Have fun.
I know little on the operational aspects of a livechat
but I'd be more than willing to help test out any aspect of it. I guess I just think that there's a certain aspect lost in a live-blog with not only a large amount of content being discussed, but when the very opportunity to have candidates willing to participate is prime. I know the foundation of this entire community is not only based on democracy, but also the blog format, however a live chat would provide the most fluid and flowing format for any opportunity. It can obviously be archived and saved, allowing those who weren't quite live enough to catch up on what was discussed. Perhaps I'm just rambling, but yeah. Live chat. Word.
Live chat
is definitely the best way to have a really free-flowing discussion of ideas. At it's best it's fantastic. At it's worst, it's a nightmare. We can work something out, I'm sure, whether it's using gmailchat, aimchat, or Robert's kyte tv (isn't that the name of it?)
I'm sure we can have enough people willing to test it. Time is short, though, if we want to have it tested in time to do something before the primaries (and fit it into everyone's schedule.)
Good times.
Be the change you wish to see in the world. --Gandhi
This is Good News!
Hope you don't mind if I spread the word...
No matter that patriotism is too often the refuge of scoundrels. Dissent, rebellion, and all-around hell-raising remain the true duty of patriots.
Progressive Discussions
In the spirit of transparency
This is the email I sent to both campaigns tonight, Jay Reiff (Moore) and Zach Ambrose (Perdue).
Do good. Be nice. Have fun.
We're on!
No date yet, but firm commitments from both campaigns!
Here's the email we received from Eli Kaplan of the Moore Campaign.
Separately, I received a phone call from Zach Ambrose of the Perdue campaign saying they would participate and would be back in touch soon about possible dates.
Do good. Be nice. Have fun.