The myth of putting corn in your tank.

crossposted from left on 49

This past February the world community of scientists published a report on global warming under the umbrella of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). That report concluded that global warming is “unequivocal” and human activity is the main driver, “very likely” causing most of the rise in temperatures since 1950.

While the rest of the world moves on and is rapidly trying to find solutions for this global environmental crisis, a few republicans pretend nothing is going on. One of them, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA), even thinks global warming is caused by farting.

So with most people being worried about global warming, except for a few republicans who also still believe that Earth is flat, folks are looking for solutions to be a little more earth and climate friendly. A lot of them seem to think that one solution for environmentally friendly fuel is corn. They couldn't be more wrong.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Let's look at a few common misconceptions about corn-based ethanol:

1. There's plenty of corn around
If every vehicle in the United States were powered by ethanol, only one out of eight would be drivable. Already, 20 percent of the nation's corn goes to ethanol production. Replacing just one-eighth of U.S. gasoline consumption would require the country's entire corn crop. Even if we planted every single acre of farmland in the US full of corn for ethanol, we still wouldn't have enough to provide all the fuel we use in the USA.

2. Corn fuel reduces greenhouse emissions
Corn-based ethanol's contribution to fighting global warming is marginal at best. Corn-based Ethanol burns cleaner than gasoline, but its production relies heavily on diesel tractors and fertilizers made from petroleum, to the tune of some 140 gallons of oil per acre. Once you have produced the corn it is also very energy intensive to distill the ethanol out of it. A recent survey by the University of California at Berkeley found that corn-based ethanol cuts greenhouse-gas emissions by, at best, 13 percent over gasoline.

3. Corn fuel boosts your engine's performance
Ethanol does boost octane, and thereby engine performance, but supplies less energy per gallon than gasoline. While it is somewhat less expensive than gas, its lower energy content means you get fewer miles per gallon. Until the price of E85 drops to about 72 percent of gas, consumers won't see any savings.

Ethanol fuel can be part of a solution, but not when it's corn based. Ethanol distilled out of sugarcane and switchgrass for example is preferable because it takes much less energy to distill and you don't need to use a mountain of pesticides to grow it. Ethanol distilled from switchgrass and plant waste is know as "cellulosic ethanol". Unfortunately a lot of research remains to be done before cellulosic ethanol will be ready for prime time.

If you really want to help the environment and curb global warming (and you should), it is much better to first of all try using your car less and look into buying a hybrid car or at least a car that gets high mileage. Until we have completely clean cars of course.

The local spin on this story:

On May 9th 2006, Robin Hayes held a press conference at a gas station outside of his district in Charlotte, NC and filled his SUV with E85 (= corn-based ethanol) while at the same time announcing he would introduce a bill to offer tax incentives for businesses that develop facilities to sell E85. Hayes was obviously oblivious to the fact that corn based-ethanol is not the solution to our environmental problems nor is it a sustainable solution for energy independence. As with most of the bills Robin introduces (and anything else he does) it went nowhere and the bill never became law.

0
momoaizo's picture

Was talking about this with friends the other day

A good point made was that if corn does become used more as a fuel, just think what that would do for the many farmers struggling to stay alive without King Tobac.

No matter that patriotism is too often the refuge of scoundrels. Dissent, rebellion, and all-around hell-raising remain the true duty of patriots.

Progressive Discussions

LiberalNC's picture

not good news for food prices though.

"We're putting the supermarket in competition with the corner filling station for the output of the farm," said Lester R. Brown, an agriculture expert in Washington, D.C., and president of the Earth Policy Institute. Farms cannot feed all the world's people and its motor vehicles as well, Mr. Brown said, and the result is that more people will go hungry.

Left on 49

Cabarrus Democrats

LiberalNC's picture

get ready to give up your steak

Get ready to go vegetarian (not that that's a bad thing), if you want to run your car on corn.

Strong demand for corn from ethanol plants is driving up the cost of livestock and will raise prices for beef, pork and chicken, the Agriculture Department said Friday.

You can read the whole article here.

Left on 49

Cabarrus Democrats

stormbear's picture

Corn can be a good first step if....

and it is a BIG IF (actually several).

The price of food is mostly reflective of the price of transportation and not the actual cost of production. For example, if you DOUBLED the price the farmer gets for the corn, a box of corn flakes goes up 2 cents.

Why are the blueberries in my local grocery in Lewisville almost $4 for 6 ounces? Because they are FLOWN from Chile. Garlic? It is shipped from China.

We are actually looking at only a fraction of the solution by switching to cane ethanol. (Hydrogen, wind, etc are all needed) We could start with all the fallow family farms who really need the income. They could initially grow corn until our infrastructure could be built to process sugar cane and switchgrass. Trust me, if you think NC farmers are in bad shape, look at West Virginia for genuine poverty. They have some of the highest percentages of fallow farms in the nation. They are also untainted by modern day pesticides. That is another rant...

Yes, I know everyone hates the idea of using corn for ethanol, but are we willing to deal with 5-7 more years of Middle East oil before we can build the infrastructure to process alternatives?

I think we can start now with corn until we get up to speed on sugar cane and switchgrass. It helps a lot of small family farms. Then we switch over to the alternatives as new refineries come online. Yes, prices are going to be high. They are already high and are going to get higher regardless of ethanol production.

Also, there is the issue of ethanol facilities here in the US. If they were all at peak capacity today and let's include the ones that are planned... if they were all pumping out eth around the clock, the percent volume of corn used would be minuscule to the total amount of corn this country grows. There simply is not enough production capacity to make an impact on food prices, nor will there be in the next 4-6 years. Yeah, we can sow every single acre of America in corn, but we would not be able to process it for ethanol use nor will we for years to come.

We can use our existing facilities to help lower our dependence on crude oil NOW and move even further with a switch to alternative agricultural products.

But, here comes the string of ifs...

We MUST be dedicated to sugar cane and switchgrass processing and move to make that happen.

We MUST start growing more food locally. Blueberries from Chile is idiotic.

We MUST deal with the sugarcane lobby which has kept US production low while lining the pockets of overseas producers.

We MUST get out of Iraq. Not that has diddle to do with corn, Ii just need to say that a lot.

--
Town Called Dobson - Daily Political Cartoon: Not all is red in rural America!

Robert P.'s picture

I'm against all corn.

But, the idea that if we shift our beef cattle off corn it would cause a huge spike in price always falls flat with me. Why is it I can go buy grass-fed beef at a decent price right now? Granted, maybe if ALL BEEF was taken off the feed lot and put out to pasture it would be a different story. But, I don't know. Some friends and I are looking into buying a whole side and splitting it up. Locally.

don't miss the point

The point being that ethanol-as-fuel is falsely "green".

It might be a reasonable alternative to fossil fuels. It might help ease our reliance on foreign oil.

It does not at all address the problem that burning anything for energy puts out greenhouse gases.

LiberalNC's picture

it isn't just "not green"

It might be a reasonable alternative to fossil fuels.

I don't think it's an alternative to fossil fuels since you have to put more fossil fuels into producing corn based ethanol (through fertilizers, tractor fuel and energy needed for distillation)than the amount of energy you actually get out of the ethanol.

Left on 49

Cabarrus Democrats

Be that as it may

It does have the potential to replace fossil fuels in some situations, even if there are other problems that would need to be addressed.

My problem is when "alternative fuels" gets mixed up with climate change, like here:

Climate Progress blog post about a National Journal survey of members of congress on their views on climate change and what are possible solutions. The most popular climate change remedy? Alternative fuels.

-B

Unique's picture

Nicely Done

You've outlined this problem succinctly.

There are trade offs in many things in this life but this one...this one is not worth the return on investment.

Any crop diverted from its primary use for food puts humans at risk. Our commodity crops are globally traded. What might become merely 'expensive' for us would become unavailable for others.

I laugh when I read people asking, 'Why do they hate us'. Well, duh. Read the news, study history.

Making fuel from hog & cattle waste - good idea. Making fuel from food, eh. Not so much.

loftT's picture

We need a plan now

With the prospect of looming unending war that will still rocket petroleum prices to the sky, we better get serious about alternatives now.

Hemp is the only proven source for economical biomass fuels

Democrats have an opportunity to lead here but so far the Republicans are the ones, at least in North and South Carolina, who are taking the reigns. Last year NC state Sen. Stan Bingham R sponsored a bill authorizing a commission to explore the beneficial uses of industrialized hemp; Gov. Mike Easley signed it into law in August.

That's a good start, but we need that American "get it done now come hell or high water" attitude. And we need leaders who can smack down the powers that be when they try and stop us.

stormbear's picture

God bless you for bringing up HEMP!

The whole problem is that

we hide our true use of fossil fuels. We, meaning the US Government, that is.

Very few people, it seems, know how much oil we truly use as a society. It goes beyond the "energy" needs of which even a few know the whole story.

The safe, purified water we drink.
The fruit and vegetables out of season.
Ink in our pens, and paper to write upon.
Nylon.
Steel.
Plastic.

We are truly the hydrocarbon society, and we will pay a horrible price for it someday soon.

Someday soon?

Ya mean like today?

Lately I've felt I'm just a few notches away from going survivalist and moving to some land I own that's off the grid.

Dude, I am with you

You never know when, or if, the balloon will go up.

Unique's picture

Just Today?

I've felt like that for years.

My Three Goals from my 20's

1)win the Nobel Prize
2)live on my own self sufficient farm
3)survive the nuclear war.

I've downsized for my 40's

1) survive

A, trying to get John to buy the 2 acres next to our 3

so I can have a garden without clearing too many trees. The forest stops at our property line and the lot next to ours is clear. I know I would have to give up solar for the land.....at least for now. That should give you all a funny visual....SD on a John Deere - or better yet walking beside a donkey pulling a plow blade. :)

Robin Hayes lied. Nobody died, but thousands of folks lost their jobs.

Unique's picture

I've Always Wanted a Mule

Can I keep him at your house?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Syndicate content

Since When is Campbell Brown My Hero?


Trying to get a straight answer out of McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds.

BTW: I'm glad that Talking Points Memo posted this excerpt on Youtube, but since when does TiVo'ing something allow you to brand it with your logo? That's the Wild West...